dennisgorelik: 2020-06-13 in my home office (Default)
1) After yesterday Craze on the stock markets, GUSH dropped further from $0.95/share down to $0.75/share

2) I missed that $0.75/share opportunity and bought 7,000 more GUSH shares in $0.97/share ... $1.00/share range, while chasing bull rally at the end of the day.

3) DRIP (3x Bear Oil&Gas ETF) is inverse to GUSH (3x Bull Oil&Gas ETF)
Normally, drop in DRIP should be ~equal to growth in GUSH.
However today DRIP dropped 23.89% while GUSH grew only 5.26% (see graph).
Most likely, that discrepancy was caused by delayed adjustment from yesterday, when GUSH dropped ~5x (way too much for 3x ETF).

4) I calculated, that yesterday GUSH 5x+ drop caused huge GUSH decay.

On 2020-03-09 GUSH went from $5.06 down to $0.95
That is 5.326x drop.
Which corresponds to 0.188 multiplication factor.
That corresponds to 0.729 drop in the underlying index SPSIOPTR (without 3x multiplication).
If the underlying index gradually returns back from 0.729 to 1.000 (from 1,706.360 to 2,340.720 that SPSIOPTR had on 2020-03-06), then it will be 1.371 increase in the underlying index.
That will correspond to 1.371 ^ 3 = 2.579x increase in GUSH price (assuming no GUSH decay on the way back up)

So 2020-03-09 GUSH decay was: 5.326x / 2.579x = 0.484 (more than 2x irreparable GUSH value loss).
Such huge single-day decay is very unusual.
The only comparable single-day decay I recall was with VIX-tracking bear ETF-s, such as SVXY on 2018-02-06

5) Considering that GUSH decayed more than 2x yesterday, it is a bit optimistic to expect GUSH to recover back to $134 level.
Still, if SPSIOPTR returns back from 1,718.51 (2020-03-06) to its maximum level 9,536.81 (2015-04-30) - it will be 5.54x price increase. Assuming no decay in GUSH, ideally GUSH may grow 5.54x ^3 = 170.90 times from $0.95/share level.
Which is $0.95 * 170.90 = $162.36

Game loss

Nov. 6th, 2016 05:39 am
dennisgorelik: (2009)
Yesterday I lost 12 hours playing diep.io.

But at least I am not loosing money alongside with the time -- like clients of Darin Notaro (AKA Steve Stevens) do:



---
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12867534
Yes, this scam is live and well in the sports betting world. There is even a CNBC reality TV show called "Money Talks" that documents and encourages this; as documented by the show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xiiv-s-DRs http://www.vipsportslasvegas.com/
The recipe is:
1. Cold call people on a lead sheet for people indicate interest on placing bets on sports games.
2. Sell interested folks with a "two week package" for $250; seems pricey, but the name of the game is to filter out the minnows catch gullible whales. You want folks who are "vested" on this and prove they have the cash to be scammed. Double-side your bets or smarter yet, side your bets by the probability implied by the Vegas oddsmakers (50% Team One Wins, 50% Team Two Wins or 70% Team One Wins, 30% Team two if spread is that way).
3. After a couple of weeks pass, call up the people who have won 4 or 5 games in a row, inevitable happenstance by sheer probability. Upsell them on a "weekend Vegas package" where they can gamble on higher stakes preferably $50K-$75K; because you're seem now as a infallible genius by the marks, you charge them a 35%-50% commission on their wins.
4. Doesn't matter if your client wins or lose. Take home the 50% commission on their churn and move onto the next one. Rinse and repeat.
The show is highly entertaining and enlightening not because of the extreme doucheness of the head scammer and his salesmen, but the marks who delude themselves as they lose game after game and gets scammed - all followed by the camera-men of CNBC and the spin-motivational commentary of the scammers.
---

It's fascinating, how "Money Talks - Sports Handicapping Reality TV" show is built in a "wrestling games" style: it does not lie and shows almost all relevant facts, but at the same time allows people who like to get duped - stay duped.

===
https://youtu.be/SUZT_fZVDi4?t=953
Anybody that says that they are going to make 71.3% the entire baseball season, besides ourselves - they are lying.
===
It's a masterpiece:
1) Darin Notaro does not claim that he makes 71.3% correct forecasts (which is important for legal reasons).
2) A gullible person may easily believe that Darin Notaro makes 71.3% correct forecasts.
3) The precision Darin puts into that number creates an impression of real number and makes it more believable.

The funny thing about that 71.3% claim is that it is a money-loosing proposition to agree to pay 50% of the winnings if you win less than 100% of the time.
With 71.3% winnings if you give away 50% of the money you win - you loose 28.7%

But 71.3% claim is also unrealistic:
---
http://www.businessinsider.com/cnbc-betting-show-star-fraud-2013-7
The 70% claim was a red flag for a lot of sports betting folks. Voulgaris, whom Nate Silver called the best sports bettor in the world, only wins about 57% of his NBA bets.
---
dennisgorelik: (2009)
Step 1: Get 500 connections.

Step 2: Play on "People You May Know" page.
- Add only people with who you already have somebody in common.
- 1 shared connection is "meh".
- Hunt for 20+ shared connections.
- Briefly review profiles of catchy new contacts: what do they do, why they have so many shared contacts?

Profile

dennisgorelik: 2020-06-13 in my home office (Default)
Dennis Gorelik

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234 567
891011 12 13 14
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 16th, 2025 09:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios