dennisgorelik: 2020-06-13 in my home office (Default)
Dennis Gorelik ([personal profile] dennisgorelik) wrote 2017-06-16 11:30 pm (UTC)

The alternative is to keep using ElasticSearch 1.6 (it is also possible that ElasticSearch 2.x is not too slow yet).
There is also a chance that standard search in ElasticSearch 5.4 is still fast.
We would just have to use older ElasticSearch 1.6 for percolator queries.

There is also some promising fork: https://github.com/meltwater/elasticsearch-batch-percolator
They promise 1000x faster percolator.
But we did not find out yet if it supports our case (elasticsearch-batch-percolator has some limitations about queries it can process).

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting